Gifts for Writers: Olympus Digital Voice Recorder
There are many occasions when it is inconvenient to pull out a notebook or a word processor to take note of some significant, but fleeting ideas. A digital voice recorder can at such times save the day — and the ideas. This device is also nearly indispensible during in-person interviews.
In my search for a recorder, I discovered that Olympus nearly rules the market, with an array of models with different features at different price points. Almost anyone can find a suitable recorder for his or her favorite writer, a gift certain to be appreciated. They are easy to find: I bought mine at Radio Shack.
I have relied on my Olympus — model VN3100PC, by the way — on many occasions: an interview a couple of weeks ago, quick observations as I moved from place to place during a rapid travel tour, longer and more thoughtful cmmentary late at night when I was too tired to write.
I recommend purchase also of a small cell phone case, perhaps with room for spare batteries and an eyelet of some sort that will accept a clasp [I’ll explain why in my next Gifts post].
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Loading ...
Olympus does rule the market and with good reason. I carry my D2300 everywhere–you never know when the muse lady will strike. Now here’s that good reason: I use this ever reliable tool to facilitate the use of my voice-recognition software which I use on both my MacBook and Dell laptops–Dragon Naturally Speaking on the Windows machine and iListen on the Mac. I can record anytime, anywhere then simply transfer the input to either machine via the Olympus recorder. Since the VR software has been “trained” to my voice, it has no problem recognizing the output from the recorder and pops it directly into Word or my scripwriting sw. This frees me from having to be at the laptop to dictate the Great American whatever.
MD
As an example, I have a long interview sitting in my Olympus right now. I keep putting off working on it, not looking forward to the task of transcribing it myself. Dragon Naturally Speaking, of course, would do it in a breeze — and I could easily spot the necessary corrections as I write my blog entry from the review. I’M SOLD!
Tom,
I’ve always believed careful, stringent proofreading is a must for a professional writer–especially those of us with logorheic tendencies–no matter how the text is delivered. The work invariably gets better. And it’s especially important for those writers-myself included-who follow William Stafford’s dictum, “There is no such thing as writer’s block for writers whose standards are low enough.”
MD
I bought the VN-3100PC about a year ago. It doesn’t get much use, but it’s invaluable when I need it. Used it to capture anything from a dialog to a board meeting, equally effective those tasks and anything in between.
Speaking of using recorders for in-person interviews…would you say they’re absolutely necessary or is simple pen and pad still legitimate?
I’ve been writing for publication for over a year now, having conducted a lot of interviews, and never once used a recorder, mainly because I didn’t want to spend the money yet. I also wonder if some interview subjects would be that comfortable being taped.
I’ve done fine with writing down all my notes for my interviews thus far; how do you know when it’s time to start recording interviews on a regular basis?
JH
Like most things, there’s are pros and cons. I usually make up my mind about whether to use the recorder at the last minute, after getting a sense of the interview subject. As you intimate, some freeze at the sight of a recorder, while others feel a sense of relief. One even has the option of emailing the digital interview file to the interview subject, if that seems appropriate.
Tom
For those reading this comment, just click on Jesse’s name — or any commenter’s name that is underlined, for that matter — and you will be taken to the commenter’s website.
Tom
Tom, thank you for the kind words. Good points about the validity of tape recorders. I often read some huge feature article in GQ Magazine, and the writer will state explicitly that he turned his tape recorder on and got the interview going.
Another writer said that he could not possibly do such an in-depth interview without the recorder. I’ve read other guys who say they just use pad and pen and do it old-school style and they’re at the top of the field.
So, I guess it really is a personal preference to a large extent.
JH